I was talking to a colleague recently. He also happens to be my favourite web designer, although that is not what this article is about.
He had been speaking to a copywriter who was proposing thirty blog posts a month for a client. The thinking was that producing more content would help the business appear in answers from ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude and other AI tools.
My mate rang me to ask what I thought.
“How 2018,” was my first response.
Not because blogging is dead. It is not. And not because publishing thirty useful articles in a month is impossible. For the right organisation, it may be entirely sensible.
The problem was that the number appeared to be the strategy. When somebody starts with “thirty blogs a month” before explaining what those articles will say, who they will help or why they need to exist, alarm bells should start ringing.
So, How Many Blog Posts Are Too Many?
There is no universal monthly limit.
You have published too many blog posts when the next one adds no meaningful value, answers no distinct question and strengthens no useful part of the website.
For one business, two articles a month might be plenty. Another organisation may have enough original research, customer questions, product updates or industry news to justify publishing every day.
The number should be the result of having worthwhile things to say. It should not be chosen first and then filled with whatever can be produced quickly enough.
More Content Does Not Automatically Mean More Authority
The theory behind high-volume blogging is easy enough to understand.
Publish more pages, cover more phrases, appear for more searches and give AI systems more material to find.
It sounds logical until you see what often happens in practice.
Once the obvious topics have been covered, the articles become thinner. Titles begin to overlap. The same advice is repackaged with slightly different wording. The business ends up with several pages trying to answer much the same question.
Thirty articles from the same company are still thirty articles from the same company.
Publishing more often does not automatically make the business more credible, experienced or trustworthy. It may simply make the blog larger.
A large blog and a useful blog are not the same thing.
The Content Treadmill Creates Its Own Problems
An arbitrary publishing target can create a content treadmill.
The calendar says another article is due, so another article gets written. Whether anybody needs it becomes almost beside the point.
Over time, subjects begin to overlap. Thin posts add little beyond what is already available elsewhere, while older and more useful articles are left untouched because everyone is busy feeding the schedule.
The blog grows, but its connection to the services the business actually provides can become weaker. Useful pages get buried beneath filler, and the business ends up with plenty of publishing activity but very little evidence of progress.
It may be paying for thirty articles, but that does not mean it is receiving thirty useful assets.
Sometimes it is simply purchasing thirty more URLs.
When Your Content Starts Competing With Itself
There is another problem with producing content at that scale: eventually, the website starts competing with itself.
This is often called keyword cannibalisation. The phrase sounds more dramatic than it needs to, but the problem is real.
It happens when several pages cover the same subject and satisfy much the same search need. Instead of building one strong, useful resource, the website spreads its relevance and internal links across several weaker versions.
For a large publisher covering thousands of products, locations or daily developments, thirty new articles a month may be manageable.
For a small business operating in a relatively low-volume market, it is much harder to justify.
There are only so many meaningful ways to answer the same handful of customer questions. Once those have been covered properly, a rigid publishing target encourages increasingly narrow variations.
An independent garage might end up with articles such as:
When Should I Service My Car?
What Does a Full Car Service Include?
How Often Does My Car Need Servicing?
Is a Full Service Worth It?
Those may look like four different titles on a content calendar.
In practice, they may overlap heavily, compete for the same searches and leave the website with several pages trying to do much the same job.
That does not strengthen the site. It gives several pages the same responsibility and leaves none of them doing it particularly well.
A small business cannot manufacture thirty genuinely different, worthwhile search opportunities every month simply because somebody has sold them a thirty-post package.
Eventually, the content begins to eat itself.
What We Do on Our Own Website
In three years, we have published 83 blogs on our website. That is fewer than 2.5 a month.
As SEOs, we understand the value of fresh content. We also understand the value of meaningful content. Somewhere between those two sits the balance.
That is exactly why we do not set arbitrary publishing targets for our own website. At KickstartSEO, we publish when we have something useful to say, not because a spreadsheet says another article is due.
That is not because we have run out of SEO subjects.
Give me half an hour and a cup of coffee and I could probably produce a list of fifty vaguely plausible titles. The harder question is whether any of them would genuinely help our readers.
Every new article should earn its place by answering a real question, explaining something more clearly, challenging bad advice, adding practical experience or improving the reader’s understanding of an important subject.
If it does none of those things, it adds another page without adding much value.
The internet already has enough of those.
Better Content Means Better Context
The shift is not simply from more content to better writing.
It is from isolated content to content that belongs.
A good blog post should not sit on the website like a spare part somebody forgot to put away. It should connect clearly with what the business does, what its customers need and what the business genuinely knows.
That means linking the article to a real customer problem, a relevant service or area of expertise, related articles that deepen the subject, useful evidence and first-hand experience.
A good article should help people understand what the business knows, what it does and why its advice is worth listening to.
It also gives search engines and AI systems clearer signals about the subjects the business is genuinely connected with.
A keyword may help somebody arrive. Context gives them a reason to trust what they find.
What Better Blog Content Looks Like
Volume-led content often begins with a broad phrase and works backwards.
You end up with articles such as: “Ten Reasons Every Small Business Needs Better Marketing.”
It is not necessarily wrong. It is simply vague enough to apply to almost anyone, which usually means it is especially useful to no one.
A stronger article might be: “What Should a Homeowner Check Before Accepting a Building Quote?”
Now we know who the reader is, what they are trying to understand and what useful experience the builder can bring.
The article has a clear purpose. It can support a relevant service, answer related questions and help the reader avoid a costly mistake.
That is useful content. It belongs somewhere.
What About Being Found in AI Answers?
This is where the thirty-blogs-a-month argument starts wearing a new hat.
High-volume content production used to be sold as a way to capture more long-tail Google searches. Now it is being sold as a way to appear in AI-generated answers.
Same tactic. New acronym.
AI search does not remove the need for useful website content. Businesses still need pages that can be discovered, understood and trusted.
But producing a high volume of general articles does not prove that those pages deserve to be selected, cited or recommended.
AI systems do not simply count how many times a company has written about itself and conclude that it must be an authority. They try to find information that helps answer the user’s question.
Depending on the platform and the search, that may include individual web pages, third-party references, reviews, forums, media coverage, research and other sources across the web.
Your own blog is part of that wider picture. It is not the entire picture.
That means businesses should focus on covering clear subjects properly, adding something beyond a generic summary, showing genuine knowledge and experience, and keeping important pages accurate and easy to understand.
Most industries already have more basic content than anyone could reasonably read.
The web does not desperately need another article explaining that businesses should “know their audience”, “create quality content” and “monitor their results”.
We are not exactly breaking the Enigma code there.
What businesses can add is experience.
They can explain what customers regularly misunderstand, show where projects go wrong, challenge commonly repeated advice and share an informed opinion built from doing the work.
A solicitor can explain the mistakes clients make before seeking advice. A garage owner can explain which warning signs drivers should never ignore. A builder can explain what homeowners should check before accepting a quote.
An SEO strategist can explain why publishing thirty blog posts a month is not, by itself, an AI-search strategy.
Experience creates information that cannot be produced simply by rearranging the top ten search results.
That is why the better question for a copywriter is not, “How many posts will you produce?”
It is:
Which customer questions will these articles answer?
What will each article add that is not already on the website?
How will overlapping articles be avoided?
What first-hand knowledge will be included?
Would improving an existing page be more useful than creating another one?
A capable copywriter should welcome those questions.
This is not an argument against copywriters. Good copywriters help businesses turn real knowledge into clear, useful content.
The problem is not the profession. The problem is mistaking production capacity for strategy.
When Thirty Blog Posts a Month Might Make Sense
There are businesses for which thirty monthly articles could be completely reasonable.
A publisher may have daily news to cover. A national retailer may have hundreds of products, guides and seasonal questions. A research organisation may regularly release original data. A large business may have several specialists contributing useful knowledge across different subjects.
Thirty posts can make sense when the organisation has enough genuinely different subjects, original information, clear editorial oversight and the resources to maintain what it publishes.
It should also have a plan for distribution and a reason for every article to exist.
Most small businesses do not have thirty worthwhile new things to say every month.
That is not a criticism. It is reality. Pretending otherwise is often an expensive route to digital wallpaper.
Sometimes the Best New Article is an Old One
A publishing target encourages businesses to keep creating new pages.
But the best content opportunity may already exist on the website.
An older article may need clearer explanations, better examples, updated information or stronger connections to related pages.
Two overlapping posts may be better combined into one useful resource.
A service page may need improvement because customers are asking questions it does not answer.
Creating something new is not always the best use of the budget.
Sometimes the smartest content decision is to stop publishing and improve what is already there.
Less exciting for the monthly output report, perhaps. More useful for the customer.
The Sensible Rule
Publish when you have something useful to add. Improve an existing page when you do not.
A new blog post should earn its place by answering a distinct question, adding meaningful experience or helping readers understand an important subject.
It should help someone make a decision, avoid a mistake or see an issue more clearly.
If it cannot do that, the website probably does not need another article.
It needs better judgement.
Activity is Not the Same as Progress
The original proposal confused activity with progress.
Thirty posts would certainly make the content calendar look busy. There would be plenty to count, plenty to report and plenty of new URLs appearing every month.
That does not mean customers, Google or AI-search systems would find the business any more useful.
At KickstartSEO, we do not publish to hit a quota (Much to Dee's frequent disappointment). We publish when we believe an article will help someone understand something, make a better decision or avoid wasting time and money.
Some months, that results in several articles. Some months, it results in two or three.
We would rather publish three articles worth reading than thirty written to satisfy a spreadsheet.
And when we create something genuinely useful, we look for sensible ways to extend its value.
That might mean turning the central argument into a fresh Substack article, a LinkedIn post, a shorter discussion or a contribution to a wider industry conversation.
Not by copying and pasting the same article everywhere. That is not a strategy. It is duplication with travel expenses.
Each version should be rewritten for the platform, shaped for the audience and built around the strongest part of the original idea.
Done properly, this gives a good idea more reach and helps build recognition beyond the business’s own website.
The website may carry the main article. LinkedIn, Substack and other relevant platforms can explore the same expertise from different angles.
That is far more useful than adding another dozy article to the website simply because the calendar says Tuesday.
Before committing to a monthly content target, find out what your website already covers, where the genuine gaps are and which existing pages deserve more attention.
Content strategy has moved on since 2018. Evolve or die.
Just don’t try to bury the problem under thirty new blog posts a month.

Can We Help?
Many people end up on our blog because their SEO is not working the way they hoped, and they are trying to work out what to do next.
Sound familiar?
If your content plan is producing more pages than useful answers, it is time to stop and take stock.
The right next step may be a new article, an improved service page, or simply a clearer view of what your website already covers.


